god-of-small-things

George Bush smacks Philip Pullman Down



God's been
kicked out of a new movie
and it's all George Bush's fault. (Thanks, Revealer.)

Apparently, New Line Cinema is unhappy with "perceived anti-religiosity" in the film.

DUH.

Pulman's work is a reworking of Paradise Lost, so that Satan is the hero and God's an old fake, so there's nothing percieved about his "anti-religiousity" as Amy Welborn points out.)

Here's a bit from Pullman himself taken from an earlier interview.


But when you look at organised religion of whatever sort – whether it's Christianity in all its variants, or whether it's Islam or some forms of extreme Hinduism – wherever you see organised religion and priesthoods and power, you see cruelty and tyranny and repression. It's almost a universal law.


There's also a fascinating exchange he had with the Archbishop of Canterbury here

Pulman is a also a critic of CS Lewis, and he makes some good points--points that most Evangelicals overlook. Like this, when asked why he hated the Narnia books:




Because the things he's being cruel to are things I value very highly. The crux of it all comes, as many people have found, with the point near the end of the Last Battle (in the Narnia books) when Susan is excluded from the stable. The stable obviously represents salvation. They're going to heaven, they're going to be saved. But Susan isn't allowed into the stable, and the reason given is that she's growing up. She's become far too interested in lipstick, nylons and invitations. One character says rather primly: 'She always was a jolly sight too keen on being grown up.'

This seems to me on the part of Lewis to reveal very weird unconscious feelings about sexuality. Here's a child whose body is changing and who's naturally responding as everyone has ever done since the history of the world to the changes that are taking place in one's body and one's feelings. She's doing what everyone has to do in order to grow up.

Maybe one day she'll grow past the invitations and the lipstick and the nylons. But my point is that it's an inevitable, important, valuable and cherishable stage that we go through. This what I'm getting at in my story. To welcome and celebrate this passage, rather than to turn from it in fear and loathing.

That's what I find particularly objectionable in Lewis – and also the fact that he kills the children at the end. Now here are these children who have gone through great adventures and learned wonderful things and would therefore be in a position to do great things to help other people. But they're taken away. He doesn't let them. For the sake of taking them off to a perpetual school holiday or something, he kills them all in a train crash. I think that's ghastly. It's a horrible message.

|

Powered by Blogger